Global Conflict Risk Index (GCRI)

The Context

The development of the GCRI conflict model started in 2014 in order to provide an accessible, objective and open-source evidence base to support the EU’s conflict prevention capacities and decision-making on long-term conflict risks. The output of the GCRI serves as the quantitative input to the EU conflict early warning framework for identifying countries at high risk of conflict and those whose risk is worsening significantly.

Building on previous work by the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC), JRC in consultation with the European External Action Service (EEAS) elaborated a methodological framework that includes a variety of structural indicators. The main goal was to rethink the concept of ‘risk of conflict’ by clustering conflicts into certain dimensions, before determining in a second step a set of associated indicators that are said to contribute to the outbreak of violence.

Data and methodology

With the assumption that structural conditions in a country are linked to the occurrence of violent conflict, the GCRI collects 25 variables in 6 risk dimensions (political, security, social, economic, geographical/environmental, demographic) and uses statistical regression models to calculate the probability and intensity of violent conflict.

Political (regime type, lack of democracy, government effectiveness, level of repression, empowerment rights), security (recent internal conflict, neighbouring with high violent conflict, years since high violent conflict), social (corruption, ethnic power change, ethnic compilation, transnational ethnic bonds, homicide rate), economic (GDP per capita, income inequality, openness, food security, unemployment), geographical/environmental (oil production, structural constraints, water stress, climate), demographic (population size, youth bulge, infant mortality) — Variables and dimensions of the GCRI model

Several model design decisions, including definition of the dependent variable, predictor variable selection, data imputation, and probability threshold definition, have been set in light of the model’s direct application in the EU policy support on conflict prevention. While the GCRI remains firmly rooted by its conception and development in the European conflict prevention policy agenda, it is validated as a scientifically robust and rigorous method for a baseline quantitative evaluation of armed conflict risk.